Indicator 3.3 - Proportion of watersheds with substantial stand-replacing disturbance in the last 20 years
supporting indicator
Stand-replacing disturbances such as fire, harvesting,
and large-scale insect damage have substantial
impacts on the water yield, timing, and peak flows
in rivers and streams. Numerical estimates of the
extent of these disturbances are described in Indicator
2.3 (Area of forest disturbed by fire, insects, disease,
and timber harvest). Disturbances will have greater
impacts if watersheds are small or disturbed within
a short time period.
National measurements of water yield, timing, and
peak flows are difficult to obtain because this task
requires expensive monitoring equipment. Therefore,
researchers are evaluating the proportion of watersheds
affected by stand-replacing disturbances to
estimate the potential hydrological impacts of these
disturbances. To reach this goal, researchers will need
to determine how best to measure this indicator, in
particular the extent of disturbance in a watershed
that constitutes a significant impact. Other issues,
related to scale and definition, will also need to be
resolved if this indicator is to reflect national trends.
For instance, watersheds can be defined by area or
by stream order and the appropriate scales must
be determined. This is a complicated and expensive
process, but research is underway in several
jurisdictions to address these issues.
About 119 million ha of Canada's forest land are
currently accessible and managed for timber production.
Most harvesting is carried out by using
variants of a clearcut, but other harvesting systems,
usually involving the partial removal of the canopy,
are increasingly being used. Disturbance from harvesting
affects approximately 1 million ha annually
and is more or less constant from year to year.
The extent of disturbance from wildfire is variable
and usually ranges from 1 to 7 million ha annually.
Damage from insects and disease tends to be cyclical
and also varies widely annually.
At present, provinces and territories are unable to
provide estimates of the proportion of watersheds
that have experienced substantial stand-replacing
disturbances since the mid-1980s. However, research
aimed at determining the proportion of watersheds
that can be harvested without causing unacceptable
damage is progressing. In addition, scientists
are studying a range of forest values, particularly
nontimber forest products and other socioeconomic
values. This should lead to detailed watershed databases
that will provide the foundation for planning
tools to predict the hydrological impacts of forest
harvesting and other disturbances across various
spatial and time scales.
These research activities often take place locally or
regionally such as within watersheds or on land
under a forest management license. For instance,
British Columbia is already augmenting its existing
watershed database, which contains 19000 entries,
to eventually include about 3 000 000 watersheds.
The current database features data on substantial
stand-replacing disturbances that took place from
the mid-1970s to the mid-1990s.
In Ontario, work is underway to determine the
impacts of forest harvesting on small watersheds.
This will eventually lead to the development of
indicators to determine harvesting impacts on water
quality at various spatial scales across forest landscapes,
and of predictive tools to help forest managers
gauge the potential impacts of harvesting on
watersheds.
In Quebec, significant work has been completed
looking at the effect of forest harvesting on the peak
output of rivers. These efforts have led to the development
of a method for calculating the equivalent
cut area (ECA) of a catchment in softwood-dominated
forests. An acceptable maximum level of ECA per
catchment has been established to protect aquatic
habitats against potential significant changes in
river output. Further studies have shown that under
Quebec operating conditions, the acceptable maximum
level of ECA is rarely exceeded in catchments
of more than 10 000 ha and that aquatic ecosystems
are not damaged. As a result, Quebec plans to
concentrate its efforts to measure Indicator 3.3
on those catchments with rivers containing either
Atlantic salmon or landlocked salmon because of
the sensitivity and the socioeconomic importance
of these species.
At this stage, the lack of data makes it impossible
to reasonably assess the sustainability of current
forest practices on the basis of this indicator.
However, the research projects presented previously
and similar initiatives underway across Canada
are expected to begin yielding significant results in
2006 or soon after.